[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testing for only the subject and the body
- To: http://www.wwa.com/~dattier (David W. Tamkin)
- Subject: Re: testing for only the subject and the body
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 16:36:39 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <http://www.miso.wwa.com/~m0wcJFl-000k2HC>
- References: <http://www.miso.wwa.com/~m0wcJFl-000k2HC>
> From: http://www.wwa.com/~dattier (David W. Tamkin)
> Date: Thu Jun 12, 6:26pm
>
> | Your solution works great! Thanks!
>
> You're welcome, but which of my suggestions did you use? There were two
> completely different approaches.
The non-scoring version. It fitted better into my existing approach.
However, I may use the scoring version in my "junk mail" catcher.
> | P.S. How did you know my last name is"? Was/is there something in the
> | header which says this?
>
> No, but either there used to be or you used to sign your full name to posts
> to the Procmail List; I remember it from then.
Ah, quite likely.
> Either that or all those Bobby Sherman and David Soul records on the 70s
> station reminded me of your work with them in _Here_Come_the_Brides_ (sorry,
> didn't watch _Primus_; it made me seasick).
I didn't even know I ever collaborated with these people! :)
Again, thank you.