[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mail archiving: Hypermail or ?
- To: Karl Schricker <http://www.erlking.corp.hp.com/~karl>
- Subject: Re: Mail archiving: Hypermail or ?
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 13:21:40 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <199703062100.http://www.erlking.corp.hp.com/~AA067372001>
- References: <199703062100.http://www.erlking.corp.hp.com/~AA067372001>
> From: Karl Schricker <http://www.erlking.corp.hp.com/~karl>
> Date: Thu Mar 6, 1:00pm
>
>
> Robert,
>
> > Hi. I see that you posted a question to comp.infosystems.www.servers.misc
> > in Oct '96 asking whether there were any alternatives to hypermail. I was
> > wondering if you indeed found any.
>
> The only alternative I found was LWGate. See:
>
> http://www.netspace.org/users/dwb/lwgate.html
>
> We are sticking with hypermail for now.
>
> Karl
Thanks. Besides LWGate, I noticed there's a thing called Babymail:
<A HREF="http://www.west.net/~jbc/tools/babymail.html">Babymail</A>
Doesn't look like many choices out there...