[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: archive of this mailing list?
- To: David Murn <http://www.hups.apana.org.au/~scuffer>
- Subject: Re: archive of this mailing list?
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 18:16:42 -0800
- Cc: http://www.vger.rutgers.edu/~linux-8086
- In-Reply-To: <http://www.grunge.hpy.hell/~Pine.LNX.3.93.970311121752.24589A-100000>
- References: <http://www.grunge.hpy.hell/~Pine.LNX.3.93.970311121752.24589A-100000>
> From: David Murn <http://www.hups.apana.org.au/~scuffer>
> Date: Tue Mar 11, 12:58pm
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Robert de Bath wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 1997, Egor Egorov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 9 Mar 1997, Robert wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does anyone know if there's an archive of this mailing list anywhere? I'd
> > > > prefer not to re-ask questions which have already been answered and
> > > > looking in an archive has always been a good alternative.
> > >
> > > I have my read-mail from this mailing list - it's about 1meg, and about few
> > > month long. :)
> >
> > Well, as long as we're waving it around I've got most everything since
> > 1st Dec 1995; compressed and uuencoded it's over a megabyte ...
>
> There is an archive at http://epocha.pd.mcs.net/Linux8086/maillist.html
>
> The earliest post there is from Alan Cox, back in Dec 95, when ELKS was at
> 0.0.8, so it should be everything you need.
>
> Davey
...which brings it back to my original message (below).
http://epocha.pd.mcs.net:80/Linux8086/maillist.html hasn't been updated
since Feb 15.
> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 15:28:21 -0800
> From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
> To: http://www.vger.rutgers.edu/~linux-8086
> Subject: archive of this mailing list?
>
> It seems that http://epocha.pd.mcs.net:80/Linux8086/threads.html is not
> getting updated on a regular basis. I have asked the webmaster
> (http://www.epocha.com/~webmaster) about it, but they have not been responding.
>
> Does anyone know if there's an archive of this mailing list anywhere? I'd
> prefer not to re-ask questions which have already been answered and
> looking in an archive has always been a good alternative.
>
> Thanks.