Re: BLOCKFOLDER & passing through

[http://www.hrweb.org/~ariel (Catherine Hampton)]

I'm sorry, but that isn't possible with the Spam Bouncer as it is,
and to make it possible would require quite a bit of reworking of
the program. :(

>I No, this is not what I want.  I want sb.rc to "fall through" instead of just
> depositing the BLOCKed mail.  I.e., when I do:
> 
> INCLUDERC=sb.rc
> 
> I want to put stuff afterwards, such as:
> 
> :0w
> *^x-sbclass: blocked
> {
> 	:0:
> 	*B??keyword1
> 	$DEFAULT
> 	:E
> 	/dev/null
> }
>  
> Again, this may (it looks like it would) involve a change to sb.rc.  In
> fact, my proposed change is from:
> 
> :0:
> * BLOCKTAG ?? yes
> | ${FORMAIL} -A"X-SBClass: Blocked" >>${BLOCKFOLDER}
> 
> To:
> 
> :0f
> * BLOCKTAG ?? yes
> | ${FORMAIL} -A"X-SBClass: Blocked" 
> :A:
> *!BLOCKFOLDER??^$
> $BLOCKFOLDER
> 
> See?
> 
>  > From: http://www.hrweb.org/~ariel (Catherine Hampton)
>  > Date: Mon  Aug 24,  9:28am
>  >
>  > If you just set BLOCKFOLDER=${DEFAULT}, that will send all blocked email
>  > back into your main mailbox, but with the Blocked: header intact.
>  > 
>  > Catherine
>  > 
>  > > I have a semi-unusual request.  Is there a way to trap (& trash as appropriate)
>  > > spam messages, but pass through blocked mail?  What I mean is that currently
>  > > if I set BLOCKFOLDER, blocked mail will go in there and the invocation of
>  > > procmail will terminate.  What I would like instead is to, say, set
>  > > BLOCKFOLDER to "" and have it only mark the message with "X-SBClass: Blocked"
>  > > and fall through to the rest of my .procmailrc script so that I can process
>  > > it further.
>  > > 
>  > > Can this be done with the current implementation of sb.rc?  If not, would
>  > > you be willing to add such a feature?
>  > > 
>  > > Thanks.
> 
> -- 
>