[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NoCeM or some other anti-SPAM mechanism for suck?
- To: <http://www.att.net/~bobyetman>
- Subject: Re: NoCeM or some other anti-SPAM mechanism for suck?
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 21:33:06 +0000
- In-Reply-To: <http://www.juryrig.worldnet.att.net/~Pine.LNX.4.21.9912081621040.432-100000>
- Keywords: http://www.att.net/~bobyetman
 > From: <http://www.att.net/~bobyetman>
 > Date: Wed  Dec  8,  4:21pm
 >
 > Actually, its never been asked.  What is NoCeM?
See http://www.cm.org
It's "cancelmoose".  It's a collaborative way of marking certain Usenet
articles as likely to be SPAM.  It seems like a nifty idea.
 > You can use the
 > killfiles to get rid of spam.
I already do.  But killfiles are imperfect ('though I am working on a
scheme for myself which may allow me to filter out frequently-posted SPAM.
NoCeM would be better, 'though, because I wouldn't even have to deal with
the "frequently-posted" issue.)
 > On Wed, 8 Dec 1999, robert wrote:
 > 
 > > This is probably a frequently asked question, but is there a NoCeM client
 > > patch or filter that can be added to suck?  If not NoCeM, is there another
 > > no-SPAM filter or patch that can be added to suck?
 > > 
 > > Thanks.