[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
formail -D & -n (was Procmail Version 3.14 released)
- To: Philip Guenther <http://www.gac.edu/~guenther>
- Subject: formail -D & -n (was Procmail Version 3.14 released)
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 15:06:55 +0000
- In-Reply-To: <199911230715.http://www.solen.gac.edu/~BAA25423>
> From: Philip Guenther <http://www.gac.edu/~guenther>
> Date: Tue Nov 23, 1:14am
>
> Changes to formail:
> - Prevent corrupt idcaches by suppressing the -n option when
> splitting with the -D option
Hi. The above caught my eye. I have some questions:
1) What if the "formail -D" is done inside a script specified by "formail -s",
but the -n is also being used? (I.e., "formail -n -s blah" where "blah"
is doing a "formail -D".) Will the ids get corrupted in that case as
well?
2) Will this "feature" always persist in the future? I currently use
"formail -D #### messids -n ### -s" in one of my scripts and I find the -n
feature great for my particular application.
(As it turns out, I was worrying about #1, and I happened to have found your
mail message in the procmail mail archive. I was thinking of adding some
lock mechanism to assure that I avert the corruption problem.)
Thanks.
P.S. Feel free to forward this to the entire procmail list if you do not have
time to address it.