[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
speech recognition
- To: "Mike McQueen" <http://www.gte.net/~mike.mcqueen>
- Subject: speech recognition
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:19:23 -0400
- In-reply-to: <000d01c34ba2$6d278ec0$0400a8c0@gte.net>
- Keywords: http://www.gte.net/~mike.mcqueen
> From: "Mike McQueen" <http://www.gte.net/~mike.mcqueen>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:59:07 -0700
>
> > Without training, it's probably 80%. But, with training, it's about 95%.
> > (I used to regularly get 99% accuracy.)
>
> Impressive numbers. Maybe with a 10 word vocabulary. But nowhere near that
> with a 5000 word vocabulary.
Actually, the commands I used were from about 200 word vocab. Going
outside that vocab seriously degraded performance.
But, speech recognition from Scansoft/Dragon is quite good these days.
Probably Microsoft's sucks.