[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Elections Web Form - the idea of bringing Diebold voting machines to Ca should die
- To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert
- Subject: RE: Elections Web Form - the idea of bringing Diebold voting machines to Ca should die
- From: http://www.ss.ca.gov/~Elections
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:48:29 -0800
- Thread-index: AcXvd5P+w88gI/EiSnOlMOu1teWwFAAJiF8Q
- Thread-topic: Elections Web Form - the idea of bringing Diebold voting machines to Ca should die
Thank you for your recent email expressing your comments regarding the possible
certification of the Diebold system.
Pursuant to Section 19204 of the Ca Election Code, a public hearing was
held on November 21, 2005 at 10:00 am, at the Secretary of State's Office, 1500
11th Street, Sacramento, to hear public comment regarding the proposed
certification of a Diebold voting system for use in Ca.
Secretary of State Bruce McPherson believes that there is no right more
fundamental and vital than the right to vote. Democracy depends on it.
He is committed to making certain that only the most reliable, secure, and
accessible voting systems are sold for use in Ca. He is also committed
to maintaining voter confidence in the voting systems used in Ca.
As Secretary of State he is the only official given the responsibility by law
of approving or rejecting voting systems for use in Ca.
All voting systems seeking approval will be required to meet current standards
and procedures and the new more rigorous standards announced in August 2005.
These standards will be put into regulation in 2006, which includes public
comment.
All voting systems seeking approval will do so through a public hearing
conducted by staff from the Secretary of State's Office. The public hearing
will be like all other public hearings required for voting system approval and
will, additionally, permit one week of public comment following the hearing.
The purpose of the public hearing is to present staff reports regarding the
voting system application and to take comments from the public that will be
reviewed before preparing the final recommendations about approval or denial of
the applications that are submitted to the Secretary of State.
The public hearings are chaired by the Acting Director of the new Office of
Voting System Technology Assessment. A member of the legal staff of the
Secretary of State's Elections Division is present along with the consultant on
voting systems employed by the Secretary of State.
Sincerely,
Elections Web Mail Representative
-----Original Message-----
From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert [http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:16 AM
To: Elections Web Mail
Subject: Elections Web Form - the idea of bringing Diebold voting
machines to Ca should die
Customer's Message *****************************
I oppose the latest effort to bring Diebold voting machines to Ca.
Please send them back until an independent auditor can truly evaluate the
reliability of these machines.
************************************************
customer_name -- Robert
street_address -- .
city -- where-I-live
state -- CA
zip_code --
area_code -- 510
telephone_number -- my-Oakland-voicemail-number
where_did_you_hear --
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Will_Ca_send_Diebold_packing_before_1118.html
Customer's Web browser - Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.4)
Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 StumbleUpon/1.89.
Form was accessed from Web page http://www.ss.ca.gov/.