> From: "kathryn m" <http://www.kathaus.org/~cat> > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:02:29 -0800 > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert) > To: "kathryn m" <http://www.kathaus.org/~cat> > Sent: 19 Feb 2006 07:38:18 -0800 > Subject: Re: cleaning house > > [ . . . ] I agree with everything you say here. > > But, then, I wouldn't ever vote > > because no candidate and no proposition would ever > > exactly fit my beliefs. > > my difficulty is that the whole process is flawed. on one > level, there is the lack of real choice. but even if there > were a real choice, if your candidate loses you're > sunk, you have no way to fight because you agreed to > the terms of the vote in the first place. I guess your proposition or whatever losing is a loss within the voting system. I suppose you have to go outside the system once you're in that position. Or try again. (Speaking of which, someone at the Trader Joes accosted us with a petition for putting that "Parental Notification" proposition back on the ballot. Some people just have too much money.) > also, how can > someone truly represent me? no one can. if a > decision affects me i want a say in it. i don't want to try > to get some politician to listen to me. he is paid by the > system and is thus beholden to it, not to me. Then, this is inherently a problem with representative democracy because, aside from corruption, a politician is beholden to her constituency. But, of course, the other unspoken part of the problem is concentration of decision power -- either in the form of the representative or the enforcement of a proposition by police/judges/lawyers. I guess this really comes down to the old community versus the individual argument, and, ultimately, trust -- whether the individual trusts the politician or the wisdom of the community or neither. Maybe it's also the size of the community. If it's too large, you no longer have a choice to choose a different community if you don't like the decisions made in that community. I guess this would be a good argument for a weak state government and an even weaker federal government. I guess this is the Thomas Jefferson view. Anyway, just a brain spew. I need to make dinner now. > not a problem. sorry you didn't sleep. > take care, > kathryn