> From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg> > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:07:16 -0800 (PST) > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Robert wrote: > > > Date: 29 Jan 2007 10:42:43 -0800 > > From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> > > To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg > > > > What's interesting is that he's arguing for moral relativism. > > > > It's funny is that this is exactly the opposite of what Sam Harris seems > > to argue. > > I don't know about that. He doesn't buy into the clash of civilizations > argument, but i think he believes our morality is lacking, though he seems to > prefer living here than in more moral India.damn, I'm not really sure what he > thinks. Well, he thinks liberals believing in moral relativism are just wrong and it's always wrong (for example) to burn brides. I think Desouza is wrong and Harris is right. I presume that Dawkins would also be against moral relativism as well, 'tho that's less clear. > Wilbur came over to thank you for calling.He didn't see any break-in signs.They > couldn't hear your phone call at 3 am. All that lost sleep over nothing??? Anyway, how'd your test go?