[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: houses
- To: "Noelle)" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/Noelleg>
- Subject: RE: houses
- From: "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 15:41:36 -0700
- Cc: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
- Keywords: bogofilter, ifile: nonspam -1837.07306051 spam -2244.93464231 downloaded -2270.30871344 ---------, spambayes, spamprobe
> From: "Noelle)" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/Noelleg>
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:21:26 -0700
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert [http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:27 PM
> >
> > I disagree. I think if we're not already at the bottom, it's around
> > there. The problem is that it will take several years for things to
> > increase in value.
>
> But I thought it's better not to increase in value since it's
> overpriced?
Yes, it is better. It's just that anyone who thinks that their house will
be an "investment" will be sorely disappointed for next 10 years.
> > Very much like L.A. in the early 80s.