[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cohousing in Mountain View
- To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg, Susan Burwen <http://www.burwen.com/~susan>
- Subject: Re: cohousing in Mountain View
- From: robert b <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 06:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: Chuck Durrett <http://www.cohousingco.com/~charles.durrett>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 May 2009 06:28:56 -0700
- Envelope-to: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert
It seems like the real limitation is the 18-20 units. 'Though not yet "active adults", Noelle and I live fine in a 880 sq ft house. If there were more units, then the per-unit cost could be smaller.
Something to consider if you'd like to attract more people.
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, Susan Burwen <http://www.burwen.com/~susan> wrote:
> From: Susan Burwen <http://www.burwen.com/~susan>
> Cc: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert, "Chuck Durrett" <http://www.cohousingco.com/~charles.durrett>
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 6:09 PM
>
> Hi Neoelle.
>
> Thank you for contacting me. In order to answer your
> question, I would like to explain some of the financial
> constraints for our cohousing project. We would welcome any
> suggestions for how we might be able to build smaller, less
> expensive condos, given these financial constraints.
>
> 3) The City of Mountain View will only allow between 18-20
> units to be built on the site. The projected building costs,
> including the land, are 14.5 million (including underground
> parking, which is very expensive). The combined selling
> price for all of the units has to be 18 million in order to
> generate the profit needed to bring in the investors. This
> profit margin for the developer and investors is consistent
> with a 20-25% developer fee typical for the industry
> (according to Katy McCamant).