[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: today
- To: "Noelle)" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/Noelleg>
- Subject: RE: today
- From: "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:57:08 -0800
- Cc: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
- Keywords: ifile: nonspam -1791.63305664 spam -2130.53221464 downloaded -2198.98825073 ---------, spambayes, spamprobe, dspam
> From: "Noelle)" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/Noelleg>
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:04:12 -0800
>
> I disagree. I can do better if I work fewer hours. They wont let me do
> that. The only way to work less is be a contractor. Then I can go to the
> CHIA convention in Sacramento in June too.
> I do not want to drag the process out any longer. I am tired of working
> here.
But, if your coding accuracy goes up, then you will be able to get
recommendations from your supervisors -- something that all future
employers will want.
If your coding accuracy goes down, then it will take longer to find work
without a supervisor's reco and you may as well get unemployment during
that time.