[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: Reply: from Gail re: LinkedIn
- To: "Gail" <http://www.cox.net/~g3>
- Subject: Re: Fw: Reply: from Gail re: LinkedIn
- From: "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:01:51 -0700
- Cc: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
- Keywords: ifile: nonspam -1109.77562141 spam -1145.26522970 downloaded -1227.66669512 ---------, spamprobe
> From: "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:52:19 -0700
>
> > From: "Gail" <http://www.cox.net/~g3>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:29:16 -0700
> >
> > Is it possible when you reply to us that you use the same method as we use
> > and most people we know use rather than those strange attachments that are
> > hard to read? We would prefer that to make things easier.
>
> Sorry. Have you considered using Outlook instead of Outlook Express? Or
> maybe using Thunderbird (to get away from Macrosoft all together)?
I think I fixed this for you (and Don).