I appreciate that. ----- >Well, I was thinking of you when I created that option. I guess I should've >said > >not single but looking (polyamorous) > >Oh, well. > >--- http://www.box.com/~browneyes wrote: >> While I nominally fit into your "not single but looking" category, being >> polyamorous (responsibly non-monogamous) I am by definition NOT a >> "cheater," which this category implies. >> >> Martin