[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: higher state taxes
- To: noelle
- Subject: Re: higher state taxes
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:46:30 -0800
- Keywords: ifile: nonspam -2015.89499807 spam -2143.85062075 downloaded -2154.01669741 ---------, spambayes, spamprobe
Interesting. Maybe it's time to implement a maximum wage.
> From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:37:03 -0800 (PST)
>
> >From Jodi Dean:
> What would an increase in the personal income tax of a size similar to
> that
> of Illinois do for other fiscally troubled states? The New York Times examined
> this question in three embattled places, New York, Ca and New Jersey.
>
> In New York, an increase of two percentage points in the state income tax
> could raise about $9 billion and perhaps tip the state into surplus.
>
> In Ca, a similar action could raise more than $13 billion, which
> would cover just a portion of that stateâ??s yawning $25 billion deficit.
>
> In New Jersey, a jump of two percentage points in each of its income
> brackets could raise nearly $5 billion, which would probably leave the state
> with a $4 billion to $7 billion deficit. Under these assumptions, a household
> with the median income would pay at least $1,000 more a year in each of these
> states; a family making $200,000 would pay $4,000 more.
>
> That an income tax increase of such a size could not close budget gaps in
> Ca and New Jersey underlines the vast challenge confronting these
> states. In Ca, Mr. has proposed a deep, billion-dollar cut in
> higher education and $4 billion worth of cuts in services for the poor and
> unemployed. Even a substantial increase in its state income tax â?? already
> much
> higher than in Illinois â?? would only soften the harshest blows.