Re: wget. I use "lynx -source" instead. But, given that you are calling this from Java, I guess it doesn't matter. (I sometimes wish I knew Java. Do you have to use the Java Native Interface to call "wget" from Java? Or is there another nicer mechanism?) --- "Jessica P. Hekman" <http://www.arborius.net/~jphekman> wrote: > Well, wget can get it if I say "wget -U Mozilla" so that we pretend to be > a real browser. Arg! I would really like to be able to just use the Java > InputSource class to do the download, but I doubt it can include > specialized headers like wget can. So I may just tell Java to use wget to > download pages. Annoying. > > j