Wow. Somebody's slow on the uptake. > From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg> > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 22:05:42 -0700 (PDT) > > > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:30:54 -0700 > > From: Spencer Graves <http://www.prodsyse.com/~spencer.graves> > > > > Hello, All: > > > > Below please find an email from David Ledesma, who had a brother > > killed in Vietnam. David has been vigiling every Saturday and Sunday, > > 11:30 AM - 1 PM for 11 years at Stevens Creek and Winchester Blvd, on a > > corner that is inside the City of Santa Clara. Today, he was harassed > > by an officer of the Santa Clara Police, claiming he was violating some > > city ordinance, though she wasn't sure which one. After the incident, > > attorney Dan Mayfield told Ledesma he would send letters to appropriate > > officials on Monday. > > > > If you can, please join David and me tomorrow, Sunday, 11:30 AM - > > 1 PM, Stevens Creek and Winchester Blvd. Bring your favorite anti-war > > sign or just a camera ;-) > > > > Best Wishes, > > Spencer > > M: 408-655-4567 > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Santa Clara Police: Sep 30, 2006 Déja vu > > Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:31:52 -0700 > > From: david <http://www.hotmail.com/~svtriathlete> > > To: david ledesma <http://www.hotmail.com/~svtriathlete> > > > > Greetings everyone- > > Today, March 21, marks 11 years that I have been protesting against war > > and militarism (and other concerns I have) at the corner of Stevens > > Creek Blvd. & Winchester Blvd. (Santa Clara corner boundary). Today, I > > was approached by Santa Clara Police Officer, Jamie Ellis (Badge #189), > > and told someone called SCPD and made a complaint about the message on > > my signs. Ellis was given the complaint. She told me that it appeared > > there was a city ordinance not allowing sidewalk signs (like mine) but > > she wasn't sure it applied to me. She asked me if I had been out there > > before with my signs. I replied, "yes, for the past 11 years, every > > weekend". She then pointed to my sidewalk signs and asked if they have > > been the same signs. I said yes. She followed that up asking if I had > > ever been approached by SCDP about it, I said "yes, but it's already > > been resolved". She asked "how long ago", I replied "about 5 years ago". > > > > She inquired what happened, so I began explaining that a SCPD SWAT guy > > (who was on over time) driving a SCPD patrol car, wearing a black jump > > suit, with no badge and no identifying name plate, who didn't like my > > signs, told me I had to take down my sidewalk signs because there was a > > city ordinance not allowing them. When I asked which ordinance, he said > > if he had to look it up on his computer he would write me a citation. > > > > I went on to explain that I took my signs down and went straight to the > > SCPD to find out what ordinance. /When the officer on duty showed me > > which ordinance, I read it and said it didn't seem to apply to me and my > > signs. It applied to signs illegally fixed to the sidewalk or other > > city property. I asked how I could file a complaint against the SWAT > > guy for denying my right to Free Speech. He said I could start by coming > > to the City Offices on Monday and visit the Code Enforcement office, and > > that I could also ask to speak with the SCPD Watch Commander. So, I > > asked to speak with the Watch Commander./ > > > > By this time I could tell Ellis was getting a little impatient at my in > > depth explanation. So, I fast forwarded to explaining my attorney, Dan > > Mayfield, wrote a letter to the SCPD Chief and City Attorney that the > > ordinance did not apply to my situation and that my First Amendment > > right to Free Speech was violated by the SCPD officer. That I would > > return the following weekend with my signs and he would be present to > > observe. > > > > I ended by explaining that I returned the following weekend with 30 > > people, the San José Mercury News and the Santa Clara Weekly, both who > > had an article and photos in their papers. > > > > Ellis then asked for my name. I gave her my name. She then asked me > > for my address. I asked why she needed my address. Then she asked for > > my I.D. to verify my address as part of her "investigation". She wanted > > to make sure I was who I said I was, in case I gave her a fake name. I > > told her I didn't want to give her my I.D., and reminded her that she > > said she wasn't even sure I was violating the ordinance in the first place. > > > > She again asked me for my name. I told her, "I already gave you my > > name". She said, "I mean your address". I said why don't you find out > > if I violated the ordinance, then come back tomorrow, I'll be here > > anyway". She said "I'm not interested in tomorrow, I'm asking you > > now". So, I asked to speak with the Watch Commander. She said "yes, > > now what's your name"? I said, I already gave you my name". She said, > > "I mean your address". She then said she's giving me a warning about my > > signs. I said, "a warning. You said you don't even know if I violated > > anything, and you're giving me a 'warning'?". > > > > I pointed to the "Yard Sale" sign on the corner next to my sign, that > > was attached by wire to the traffic light pole. She said "that's got > > nothing to do with this". I said, "nothing to do with this? That's the > > whole reason why you're here!". > > > > By this time another police car showed up. The officer asked, "does he > > have a permit for this?". I replied, "I don't need a permit". She > > again tried to get my I.D., and I refused. The other officer asked her > > to step away and talk. She said she would be back. They consulted for > > a couple minutes, I went back to my protest, then they both drove off. > > > > Maybe she'll be back tomorrow, maybe not. But, I will be there, > > 11:30am-1pm. Maybe I'll see you there too! > > -D. > > > > To post to this group, send email to http://www.googlegroups.com/~occupy-where-I-live. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/occupy-where-I-live. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.