[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[New comment] Boston Globe Article about EMR Problems (fwd)
- To: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Subject: [New comment] Boston Globe Article about EMR Problems (fwd)
- From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
- User-agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
> From: "Roger A. Maduro" <http://www.linkedin.com/~groups-noreply>
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 17:53:54 +0000 (UTC)
>
> <strong>Roger A. Maduro</strong> just posted a comment in EMR / EHR Clinical
> Transformation
>
> Boston Globe Article about EMR Problems
>
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2014/07/19/obama-pushed-electronic-health-records-with-huge-taxpayer-subsidies-but-has-rebuffed-calls-for-hazards-monitoring-despite-evidence-harm/OV4njlT6JgLN67Fp1pZ01I/story.html
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> The Stark bill in 2007 proposed that if government funds were to be used to
> subsidize EHRs, then the EHRs should be open source so everyone could
> benefit from the improvements and openness. It was defeated by a massive
> lobbying campaign by the proprietary EHR vendors who spent over $100 million
> to make sure no such bill every passed. What the Boston Globe article misses
> is while $30 billion were spent to subsidize lousy and expensive proprietary
> EHRs, medical facilities (hospitals, clinics, and doctors offices) have
> spent collectively over one trillion dollars installing them. Wonder why
> Sutter Health now charges $55,000 for a simple appendectomy?
>
> Roger A. Maduro
> Publisher and Editor-in-Chief Open Health News