I guess Wanda must be a biologist? That's the only way I could imagine that she's convinced by the theory put forth. If she's not, then her opinion is no better than anybody else's. > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:20:41 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: "Disqus" <http://www.disqus.net/~notifications> > > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:10:22 -0000 > > > > Wanda Tinasky wrote, in response to Noelle: > > > > Of course not, neither do I. What I _do_ want is to channel that financial > > aid to those people who would benefit the most from it (ie, underprivileged > > kids who have demonstrated some intellectual ability). What research like > > this would allow us to do (potentially) is to drop the myth that the > > underprivileged are poor solely because they lack capital resources. > > Thinking like that results in a lot of money being wasted on people who don' > > t actually have the capacity to benefit from higher education. > > > > If your concerns are primarily about the potential political misuse of this > > data (as it appears to be) then you should make that explicit in your > > comments instead of pointlessly trying to assail the science itself. I agree > > that policies based on science like this need to be rationally constructed, > > and we need as many voices as possible focused on that problem. > > > > Link to comment: > > http://redirect.disqus.com/url?impression=b9168a0e-d7f2-11e4-9204-002590f0f6c8&experiment=digests&behavior=click&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kqed.org%2Fa%2Fforum%2FR201503311000%23comment-1938836488%3ADiPQo_wBmATBytN3BjIsHqxvwLY&type=notification.post.registered&variant=active&event=email > > > > Noelle wrote: > > > > I just don't want politicians you don't have much confidence in either using > > this guy's findings as an excuse to give up on helping college students from > > non-privileged backgrounds, or saying the poor don't need food stamps, it's > > their fault they can't make enough money. > > It took me 7 years to get a bachelor's degree from UC . I married a > > smart software engineer who supported me when I was unemployed during the > > Great Recession. Whenever someone argues something is due to genetics I am > > not totally closed to the possibility, but many of us you see here are still > > skeptical that that is the whole explanation.