[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Google Inceptionism
- To: http://www.gmail.com/~alex. (Alexander ), http://www.umass.edu/~a (Alexander ), Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
- Subject: Re: Google Inceptionism
- From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:52:56 -0700
- Keywords: ifile: nonspam -1603.83548260 spam -1738.63356209 downloaded -2280.59830666 ---------
> From: Alex <http://www.gmail.com/~alex.>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:31:45 -0700
>
> In process of trying to make neural networks less of a black box, google
> made some weird art
>
> http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html
Interesting.
I guess what this really shows is that you can come up with statistics to
proof any preconceived conclusion you want.