Re: NPR Ombud Responds on 'All-Corporate Lobbyist' Alert (fwd)

[robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>]

Yeah, NPR almost never mentions the secrecy of the TPP "trade" deal.  They
talk about it as if everybody knows what's in it.

It's weird that people didn't listen to the NPR report.  I guess not
everybody listens to NPR all the time like we do...

 > From: Noelle <noelle>
 > Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
 >
 >  > From: [** utf-8 charset **] FAIR<http://www.fair.org/~fair>
 >  > Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 00:05:42 +0000
 >  > 
 >  > NPR ombud Elizabeth Jensen's commentary was illustrated with a photo 
 >  > of Barack Obama signing Fast Track; with the voice of an outside observer, 
 >  > NPR's report on Fast Track's passage "might have seemed 
 >  > less like a victory lap." (photo: Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)
 >  > NPR ombud Elizabeth Jensen wrote a column (7/1/15) responding to a FAIR 
 >  > Action Alert, "NPR Celebrates Fast-Track Victory With an All-Corporate 
 >  > Lobbyist Segment" (6/27/15).
 >  > Jensen acknowledges that the report in question (Morning Edition, 6/25/15), 
 >  > which featured three executives from business lobbies talking about Congress
 >  > 's passage of corporate-backed Fast-Track legislation, "would 
 >  > have been stronger and more complete if it had included a voice representing 
 >  > the opponents." She also said that
 >  > the report might have seemed less like a victory lap had one of the three 
 >  > voices been an outside observer, perhaps an academic or someone from a think 
 >  > tank, commenting on the winners' tactics.
 >  > But, Jensen said, the "report did summarize the views of opponentsâ??
 >  > not just once, but in three placesâ??so it was not nearly as one-sided as 
 >  > FAIR claims." She encouraged NPR to air "a follow-up report on 
 >  > how the opponents are regrouping."
 >  > Jensen also talked to Neal Carruth, a senior editor on NPR's business 
 >  > desk, who said that if the piece by Yuki Noguchi had been longer, it 
 >  > 8220;could have devoted more space to the opposition's views regarding 
 >  > the business community's win." But, he said, "the piece 
 >  > did not ignore the opposition." He noted that the piece was intended 
 >  > as "a counterpoint to an earlier report by Jason Margolis on 
 >  > organized labor's success in temporarily derailing the administration
 >  > 's trade agenda."
 >  > It's worth noting that that earlier piece (Morning Edition, 6/16/15), 
 >  > while focused on labor, did not exclusively feature labor voices. One of the 
 >  > four sources was the kind of outside observer that Jensen said would have 
 >  > made the corporate lobbyist piece "less like a victory lap," 
 >  > while another was a critic of union activism, arguing that "labor 
 >  > should stop trying to kill the new trade pact and instead push for a more 
 >  > robust 21st century social safety net for dislocated workers"
 >  > 'the kind of oppositional voice that would have made the later segment 
 >  > 8220;stronger and more complete."
 >  > FAIR emphasizes that public radio was established to be an alternative to 
 >  > commercial broadcasting, which is dependent on corporate advertising. With 
 >  > 75 percent of NPR affiliate board members coming from the corporate sector (
 >  > FAIR Study, 7/2/15), and public radio looking to increase its already 
 >  > substantial corporate funding (FAIR Blog, 5/22/15), it's troubling 
 >  > that NPR News seems more careful to make sure that labor voices are balanced 
 >  > than that there be an alternative to the perspective of Big Business.
 >  > Finally, I was struck by Jensen's parenthetical comment that many of 
 >  > the emails she received came "from people who clearly had not listened 
 >  > to or read the report in question." There are millions of people in 
 >  > the world who have impressions about things that they did not experience 
 >  > directly, thanks to NPR News. If Jensen believes this is problematic, she 
 >  > might want to ask NPR to rethink its involvement in the practice of 
 >  > journalism.
 >  > We do offer our sincere thanks to Jensen and Carruth for responding to our 
 >  > concerns, and to all the media activists who took part in the campaign.
 >  > Jensen's full response follows:
 >  > Over the weekend, the left-of-center "media watch group" known 
 >  > as FAIR, for Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting, sent out an "Action 
 >  > Alert" with the headline "NPR Celebrates Fast-Track Victory With 
 >  > an All-Corporate Lobbyist Segment." The alert generated a number of 
 >  > emails to my office (many from people who clearly had not listened to or 
 >  > read the report in question).
 >  > The alert targeted a June 25 Morning Edition report by business 
 >  > correspondent Yuki Noguchi, which followed Congress' approval of 
 >  > legislation granting President Barack Obama fast-track authority to 
 >  > negotiate trade agreements.
 >  > FAIR complained that the report quoted only three "corporate lobbyists"
 >  > who were in favor of the fast-track deal, adding:
 >  > What of the literally thousands of labor, environmental and other public 
 >  > interest groups that strenuously opposed giving Obama fast-track authority? 
 >  > They were relegated to a one-line summary from Noguchi: "Labor and 
 >  > environmental groups criticized the fast-track deal, calling it worse than 
 >  > the North American Free Trade Agreement passed two decades ago."
 >  > FAIR asked why "NPR News talked only with corporate lobbyists to cover 
 >  > the victory of fast track."
 >  > I asked Noguchi's supervisor, Neal Carruth, who is supervising senior 
 >  > editor on the business desk, about the report. He told me:
 >  > 
 >  > Yuki's assignment was to report on a significant victory for the 
 >  > business community, which had been working in concert with the Obama 
 >  > administration. The idea behind the story was to explain how the business 
 >  > lobby had turned an apparent defeat into a win for its side. In many ways, 
 >  > her story was a counterpoint to an earlier report by Jason Margolis on 
 >  > organized labor's success in temporarily derailing the administration
 >  > 's trade agenda.
 >  > With a subject as complex and multifaceted as global trade, no single story 
 >  > can tell the entire tale. In the aggregate, of course, our coverage should 
 >  > reflect the many competing views on the president's trade negotiating 
 >  > authority and the trade deals under negotiation.
 >  > And we work very hard to make sure it does that.
 >  > In the item at hand, Yuki cited the objections of labor and environmental 
 >  > groups to Trade Promotion Authority, even though the focus was on the 
 >  > business community. She also noted that US manufacturing employment declined 
 >  > after an "initial bump" following the passage of NAFTA. Yuki
 >  > 's piece was just over two minutes long, short by NPR standards. With 
 >  > more time, we certainly could have devoted more space to the opposition
 >  > 's views regarding the business community's win. But the piece did 
 >  > not ignore the opposition. Alternatively, we could have directed listeners 
 >  > to earlier coverage NPR has done on those who are opposed to Trade Promotion 
 >  > Authority and the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
 >  > 
 >  > Carruth was referring to this report by Margolis from June 16, which indeed 
 >  > devoted extensive time to labor union opposition to the Trans-Pacific 
 >  > Partnership, a trade deal that is being negotiated by the administration in 
 >  > secretâ??as are all trade negotiationsâ??now under fast-track authority.
 >  > My take? Even before I heard from FAIR I heard from passionate listeners 
 >  > about NPR's TPP and fast-track coverage, with complaints that NPR had 
 >  > failed to cover the secrecy with which the TPP was being negotiated and that 
 >  > NPR had not reported on non-labor concerns about the deal. Of course, not 
 >  > every listener can hear and read every NPR report, but, in fact, NPR has 
 >  > covered those aspects of the issue; see reportshere, here, here and here.
 >  > It's also important to note that Morning Edition host Renee Montagne 
 >  > introduced Noguchi's report this way:
 >  > The business community won a big victory yesterday. Congress gave the 
 >  > president authority to more easily negotiate a trade deal with countries 
 >  > that encircle the Pacific Ocean. It's known as fast-track authority. 
 >  > Labor unions and environmental groups opposed giving Obama that authority. 
 >  > They argued that a deal would allow companies to shift jobs overseas and 
 >  > also get around regulations. NPR's Yuki Noguchi reports on the 
 >  > arguments that businesses say won a long and complicated fight.
 >  > Much of the report, as Carruth said and Montagne's introduction 
 >  > promised, revolved around the strategies used to get the legislation passed, 
 >  > a topic potentially of interest to those on both sides of the issue. However,
 >  >  the report might have seemed less like a victory lap had one of the three 
 >  > voices been an outside observer, perhaps an academic or someone from a think 
 >  > tank, commenting on the winners' tactics.
 >  > As for the opponents to the deal: Yes, the report would have been stronger 
 >  > and more complete if it had included a voice representing the opponents. One 
 >  > of the strengths of radio is hearing directly from a participant in a fierce 
 >  > debate rather than hearing words quoted by a reporter. But the time allotted 
 >  > was short and this report did summarize the views of opponentsâ??not just 
 >  > once, but in three placesâ??so it was not nearly as one-sided as FAIR 
 >  > claims. (FAIR did acknowledge the summary of the opponents' views but 
 >  > said it was not enough.)
 >  > Meanwhile, a follow-up report on how the opponents are regrouping would be 
 >  > logical, and indeed, I would expect to see such a report once the TPP is 
 >  > finalized and heads to Congress for a vote.