Re: FW: naunce Feedback/Concerns

[robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>]

Sorta sounds like the hole I fell into at Macrosoft.  Probably a good idea
to move on rather than try to struggle (as I did) to attempt to improve
things.

Did you contact that other xamhealth guy?  I suspect that that would be
your last best chance at staying with mamix.

 > From: Noelle <noelle>
 > Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:44:04 -0400
 >
 >  The you are not meeting expectations email. Good.
 > 
 >  From: Scott Shimko
 >  Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 5:38 PM
 >  To: Noelle
 >  Cc: Colleen Carey; Jonathon Cole; Alicia Clay
 >  Subject: naunce Feedback/Concerns
 > 
 >  Good afternoon Noelle,
 > 
 >  I wanted to reach out with some feedback after a conversation with the manager of the new project you have been on.  Iâ??ve included Alicia Clay as well as she has been on this team for quite some time and I like to have her be a resource specifically to mamix staff on the team who might be struggling in one area or another. She wants to do what she can to help those folks be successful here, as do I.
 > 
 >  This project relies heavily on someone who expert coding knowledge but almost as importantly is someone who can also be very detailed oriented. The coders are also expected to participate collaboratively with other coders in discussions for standards implementation and revisions.
 > 
 >  The project has some tight timelines so they are really needing everyone to be focused and showing improvement each week towards the projects goals and objectives.
 > 
 >  The feedback Iâ??ve received is that the annotation requirements are actually pretty simple but do require the coders to thoroughly review a single file for evidence or lack of evidence to support or remove the automated query.
 > 
 >  Karen let me know you are verbally participating in the group training and check ins which is good and what they want. She also said you have provided feedback for improvement in the Standards which resulted in additional standard changes. She also noted your productivity has markedly improved since last week when she felt you were behind where you should have been.
 > 
 >  However, she does have some concerns on the quality of your annotations which at times have been a bit unreliable.  I asked her to please detail some of that more specifically as we want to try to help you get where you need to be.
 > 
 >  Listed below are some of the areas that need improvement per Karen:
 > 
 >  o         Incomplete and inaccurate annotations
 > 
 >  o         Lack of understanding of the application of the standards during classroom sessions.
 > 
 >  o         Often has the opposite answer when asked to enter the answer in the Webex Chat during the sessions.
 > 
 >  o         Noelle is verbally participating but does sometimes does not have the correct answers sometimes for straightforward coding questions or guidelines.
 > 
 >   Noelle has been given feedback on the incompleteness of her annotations and has completed the circle back to correct the ones that they have found.
 > 
 >  Iâ??m open as well to your feedback.