> From: Flora <http://www.gmail.com/~flora> > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:34:52 -0400 > > SSA doesn't *require* 2 factor authentication, but it's still available. > https://www.ssa.gov/myaccount/ Ah. But, it's still unclear whether they are moving towards 2-factor or not. My feeling is that they'll need something that doesn't depend solely upon cell phones. > We may not like the idea of Google giving up our personal info to the > government, but they are one of the best companies in regards to security. While that may be true, it is still a single point of failure. Diversifying break points would be much better, but there is no current option for this. > I think many government entities have a ways to go in protecting our PII. > > On Sep 8, 2016 9:56 AM, "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote: > > I like the Google Authenticator idea, and even the "push" technology > > mentioned, but I just wish it weren't *Google* -- which, from Edward > > Snowden's leaked documents show, is just another corporate entity willing > > to bend over backwards at the government's behest. Someone needs to come > > up with a non-centralized, distributed authentication system that doesn't > > have a single point of failure. > > > > P.S. BTW, it's funny that he mentioned the Social Security Administration > > moving towards 2-factor. He must have written this before the SSA > > reversed themselves...