> From: Flora <http://www.gmail.com/~flora> > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 21:15:36 -0500 > > Thank you for your additional suggestions. Would you please clarify the two > below? I want to be able to understand and explain them. > > *Companies that maintain or retain personal information be liable via* > *the courts. I.e., exclude arbitration clauses from identity theft.* > Specifically, what do you mean by "exclude arbitration clauses from > identity theft?" Do you mean that they could get out of any liability for > identity theft? Yes. In particular, most arbitration clauses release them from any liability related to identity theft and, often, class action lawsuits related to such thefts. > *I'd also ask that the government require that credit score calculations > be **open-sourced rather than proprietary.* > What do you mean by open-sourced? How would that work? Their algorithms should be made public. Right now, they are secret and it's impossible to tell how any identity theft affects your credit score exactly. > I really like your idea of eliminating social security numbers as a form of > ID. This should never have happened in the first place. You and I both know > that this is not a very good way to verify someone's identity. With all the > breaches we have had, anybody's social security number could be presented > as a form of identity. I'm wondering how you could legislate this. > > Thanks!