> From: http://www.cs..edu/~bh > Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 01:06:38 -0700 > > The conference in Bordeaux was wonderful. The only problem was that I > never convinced my dinner companions to go for a 300-Euro bottle of > St. Emilion Premier Cru. And it was too hectic; it wasn't until yesterday > that I managed to find time to shower, despite the extreme heat most days > (except for the one day with the enormous thunderstorm). > > The conference was in three locations, all conveniently located on the > Tram B. Except that the week of the conference they scheduled some huge > repair project that made half a dozen tram stops in the middle unreachable. > They had a shuttle bus to replace the tram, but for reasons I will never > understand, you had to walk all the way from the temporary end of the tram > line to where the next stop was supposed to be, which doesn't sound like the > end of the world, but I'm an old man with chronic leg pains, and it was about > 200 degrees out. > > The opening reception was in a science museum, luckily in the direction that > was still reachable by tram. Several scheduled speakers were sick and had to > cancel at the last minute, so I ended up giving a hastily-prepared talk. > Joek, who organized all this, told me to touch on the 10th anniversary of > Scratch and the 50th anniversary of Logo. First problem: I couldn't find my > power adapter, so I borrowed Cynthia's. Second problem: I could have sworn I > had an HDMI adapter for my Powerbook, but it turns out I had anything but. So > there was a delay while someone dug up a VGA cable. Eventually I got set up, > and fired up Logo, which isn't 50 years old but is much like Logos > from back then (one triangular turtle, for example; textscreen vs. fullscreen > vs. splitscreen). I reminded them that we had really slow computers and no > internet, so we couldn't do the fancy graphics and the social network of > Scratch. But what we /did/ have was the ability to write procedures, > including recursive functions, and to make lists of lists straightforwardly. > I did Vee in Logo, then talked about why you can't do it in Scratch. I then > characterized Snap! as being an effort to bring back to Scratch everything we > could do in Logo. And then showed Vee in Snap!, as usual first presenting it > as if they were students, and then pointing out that on the stage we have a > list of blocks, and we don't say a word about lists of blocks in the lesson, > but kids know what a list looks like, and they know what a block looks like, > so it's perfectly obvious to them what they're looking at, even though they've > never seen procedure-as-data before, because in this case the picture really > is worth 1000 words. > > Anyway, people seemed to like it; even Cynthia didn't complain about anything > I said. :-)