Re: Alliance CU seminar (fwd)

[robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>]

Do you have the original form, still?  Let's take a look at it.

 > From: Noelle <noelle>
 > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:03:23 -0800 (PST)
 >
 > yes?
 > 
 > On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, robert wrote:
 > 
 >  > To: noelle
 >  > 
 >  > According to
 >  > 
 >  >  https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/residuary_beneficiary
 >  > 
 >  > "Residuary Beneficiaries" is all the other beneficiaries.
 >  > 
 >  > Who did you include for the personal property?  We should add all other
 >  > conceivable beneficiaries not in that list.
 >  > 
 >  > I assume that that is the only thing preventing the remainder of the
 >  > documents being sent.
 >  > 
 >  >  > From: Noelle <noelle>
 >  >  > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 12:46:11 -0800 (PST)
 >  >  >
 >  >  >  > From: "http://www.ainerfraker.com/~john"; <http://www.ainerfraker.com/~john>
 >  >  >  > Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:41:20 +0000
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  >  Hi Noelle,
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  >  I have put together the draft version of your documents.
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  >  Please review the attached Confirmation of Names & Roles, and let me 
 >  >  >  >  know 
 >  >  >  >  if there are any needed changes.
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  >  Also, on the Questionnaire, it didn't specify the "Residuary 
 >  >  >  >  Beneficiaries" 
 >  >  >  >  - ie who gets what after the personal property is distributed.