> From: "Disqus" <http://www.disqus.net/~notifications> > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:19:19 -0000 > > Bill_Woods wrote, in response to Noelle: > > That film is not good history. The screenplay includes sufficient elements > and details from the actual historical story to indicate that Amenábar and > Gil did enough homework to have been able to depict things as they actually > happened. But this is a movie with a message and an agenda, so these > elements get mixed around, downplayed, countered or simply distorted to suit > Amenábar's objectives. More importantly, most of the elements that support > the "message" the director is preaching are wholesale fictional inventions. > To begin with, as I detailed in my article last year, there was no > "Great Library of Alexandria" as such in the city at this time. The former > Great Library had degraded and suffered several major losses of books over > the centuries but it had ceased to exist by this stage - the last clear > reference to it that we know of dates all the way back to AD 135. > http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2010/05/hypatia-and-agora-redux.html > > Link to comment: > https://disq.us/url?impression=42ef46f6-fd45-11e7-ab7c-002590f38886&experiment=digests&behavior=click&url=https%3A%2F%2Fww2.kqed.org%2Fforum%2F2018%2F01%2F18%2Fmore-than-100000-bay-area-women-expected-at-womens-marches-saturday%2F%23comment-3716138684%3A7LE4CNLKVt_9FG6Szpy7jMVC7PY&variant=active&type=notification.post.registered&event=email > > Noelle wrote: > > yes, the film Agora is worth viewing again. Anti-science mobs destroyed the library of Alexandria.