[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NYTimes.com: San Francisco’s Big Seismic G amble
- To: Heather Howard <http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40>, http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
- Subject: Re: NYTimes.com: San Francisco’s Big Seismic G amble
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 08:07:21 -0700
- Keywords: ifile: nonspam -1422.53295469 spam -1534.56910610 downloaded -2159.63629627 ---------
It's surprising that Ca's building codes operate under the
assumption that having a complete failure of 10% of all tall buildings is
acceptable. Seems like some politicians are taking a big risk.
> From: Heather Howard <http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40>
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:40:30 -0700
>
> A very interesting read.
>
> >From The New York Times:
>
> San Franciscoâ??s Big Seismic Gamble
>
> The cityâ??s building code does not protect its people from earthquakes nearly
> as much as you might think.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/04/17/us/san-francisco-earthquake-seismic-gamble.html