After re-reading the funding section of the trust, I'm wondering about a couple of things. First, whether it makes sense to designate the beneficiary of IRA's and 401k's as the trust. I assume that, in general, naming the trust as the beneficiary cannot hurt and may end up helping since it may provide protection against creditors. It looks like the only possible downside, according to https://www.thebalance.com/choosing-beneficiaries-for-iras-and-401k-3505288 is the five-year-rule for 401k's, that beneficiaries need to pull out all the money within 5 years. I assume that most of that will be taxed as income. But, I further assume that this would be the case whether the beneficiary were an individual or the trust. Second, whether ownership for bank accounts (checking, saving) should be changed to the trust, or whether it's sufficient to just designate a beneficiary for these. So far, we were thinking that it was sufficient to just change the beneficiary to be the trust, but the "Trust Funding Instructions" section of the estate planning document suggests retitling the accounts to be the trust. I assume that changing ownership/title is preferable to simply changing the beneficiary? Thanks.