[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NYTimes.com: Why Housing Policy Is Climate Policy
- To: Heather Howard <http://www.icloud.com/~hhoward40>
- Subject: Re: NYTimes.com: Why Housing Policy Is Climate Policy
- From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 11:30:40 -0700
- Cc: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
- Keywords: our-San-Jose-phone-number
> From: Heather Howard <http://www.icloud.com/~hhoward40>
> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:11:10 -0700
>
> Or it’s the cows farting:
> https://animals.howstuffworks.com/mammals/methane-cow.htm
Maybe part of the Green New Deal should be that anybody who has to commute
more than 50 miles to work is required to be a vegetarian ;-).
> > On Apr 7, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote:
> >> From: Heather Howard <http://www.icloud.com/~hhoward40>
> >> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:59:21 -0700
> >>
> >> From The New York Times:
> >>
> >> Why Housing Policy Is Climate Policy
> >>
> >> In Ca, where home prices are pushing people farther from their jobs,
> >>
> >> rising traffic is creating more pollution.
> >>
> >> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opinion/ca-home-prices-climate.html
> >
> > No doubt, this is true.
> >
> > But, everyone ignores the United State military. That's what should
> > really be reformed.
> >
> > https://sandiegofreepress.org/2014/11/the-us-military-is-a-major-contributor-to-global-warming/
> >
> > "The US military is the largest single consumer of energy in the world. If
> > it were a country, the Department of Defense (DoD) would rank 34th in the
> > world in average daily oil use, coming in just behind Iraq and just ahead
> > of Sweden."