I guess we should be happy that they don't propose spending that money on just shipping the homeless to another state. > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:42:43 -0700 (PDT) > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019, Robert wrote: > > This made me thing of why would someone bother owning a human when they > > could rent them as a day laborer. Sort of like taking Uber instead of > > owning a car, or renting an apartment instead of owning a home, or > > borrowing a power tool rather than owning it. > > > > Then I read that slave owners did rent out their slaves for a fee. > > > > What's interesting is that, in general, it was much more difficult for > > slaves to escape during these rentals simply because of their complexion. > > It made me realize that skin color can be used as an easy attribute for > > people to be targetted -- sort of like being chipped, but even before > > there were electronics. (I guess these days they use the word > > "profiling".) In other words, slavery in the United States had to be > > race-based in order for it to be so effective. > > > > (I wonder if they branded white indentured servants? Brands and tattoos > > might be easier to cover up.) > > probably not, since they were "temps" > > https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/04/10/how-much-would-it-cost-to-house-the-bay-areas-homeless-try-12-7-billion/