Well, there could be a good argument (not argued below, obviously) that it's public transportation which produces housing, not the other way around. > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:07:15 -0700 (PDT) > > > Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 22:53:02 +0000 (UTC) > > From: "Nextdoor Japantown" <http://www.rs.email.nextdoor.com/~reply> > > > > Nextdoor Nextdoor Japantown > > > > The Homeless Industrial Complex > > > > Tim Clauson, Vendome - Civic Center > > > > Something for us all to think about as the new proposals from out of town > > developers that want come into our neighborhoods. We see developers telling > > local residents that in order to provide adequate on-site parking in their > > developments it just doesn't "pencil in to their desired profits. This is > > turning residential SFD neighborhoods into the development's parking lots so > > they can then "pencil in profits over parking" Sacramento politicians are > > pushing low to no parking in high density developments with remarks being > > stated that the people will have to "feel the pain" before they stop owning > > cars and use public transportation due to lack of parking. Without voicing > > your concerns over the overcrowded streets, daily fight to find a parking > > spot > > near your own home, stress and anger related health conditions, air and > > noise > > level pollutions, financial cost to SFD homeowner (responsible for repairs > > of > > over crowded sidewalks and damaged curbs by higher rate of users living in > > the > > new high density developments), trash left in front of your homes by your > > new > > neighbors who drop it at the curb all will change your way of living in our > > treasured single family neighborhoods in the near future. The screaming of > > those who say "have compassion" etc are not seeing the full picture. I am > > providing this link to open everyones eyes to what is really going on. Food > > for thought. Big business grabbing local funds to build a few low income > > units while profiting off the "fair market rates units" in their high > > density > > developments all while changing our neighborhoods for ever with no regard to > > the impact on the wellbeing of those who have lived here for years. This is > > being pushed to accommodate "future" where-I-live residents at the cost to those > > who have been here for years, paying taxes, who voted for bonds to help the > > low income and homeless. What responsibility does the local government > > have > > to tax payers who pay their salaries as they design and change our city? > > What > > mitigation will they provide for our local streets in regard to traffic cut > > throughs, and scarce parking? > > https://caglobe.com/uncategorized/the-homeless-industrial-complex/