[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: About Planet of the Humans and Climate Change (fwd)
- To: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: About Planet of the Humans and Climate Change (fwd)
- From: Noelle <noelle>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 in-012.lax.mailroute.net 49CDML36Fsz2Dc5n
- User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
> From: Olga Mandrussow <http://www.gmail.com/~mandrussow>
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:50:03 -0700
>
> Noelle,
>
> I did not contact 350BayArea.org! They must have heard from others, or
> maybe saw it themselves.
>
> I agree with your rebuttal.
>
> Olga
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 2:48 PM Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg> wrote:
> > I really did not like Emily Atkin's critique.
> > I did not think the overpopulation part of film was light, in fact,
> > there was really not much detail about what the filmmaker's ideal
> > way to address overpopulation, so how come everyone is jumping to
> > the conclusion that he is for abusive population control measures?
> >
> > Again, not the perfect film, but I still hope that it will create
> > serious discussions. Thanks for writing to 350 Bay Area.
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Olga Mandrussow wrote:
> > > FYI
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > > From: Laura Neish <http://www.350bayarea.org/~info>
> > > Date: Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:15 PM
> > > Subject: About Planet of the Humans and Climate Change
> > > To: Olga Mandrussow <http://www.gmail.com/~mandrussow>
> > >
> > > Good afternoon Olga,
> > >
> > > There is a lot of concern out there about issues raised by the
> > > Planet of the Humans documentary, and many eloquent rebuttals,
> > > to which we have provided links below. Here are some key
> > > takeaways:
> > >
> > > - Most *climate and other environmental groups have long
> > > rejected energy generation from biomass* as not being part
> > > of a just transition to clean energy. Not just because
> > > there are better solutions, but because *of course* big
> > > corporate interests are promoting super irresponsible ways
> > > of going about it. Besides, we really need to stop setting
> > > things on fire. Watch Burned <https://350bayarea.nationbuilder.com/r?u=HtTWIX2J6xu7JgpyFsSvmzMd3Bx7QvWcZuzbd5Z4VOs&e=ea10f30fb62dc059fa1dd71d0efa3ae4&utm_source=350bayarea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=covid_5&n=1>
> > > to find out more.
> > > - Yes, lifestyles and consumption choices will need to
> > > change. *We can’t just rely on a switch to clean
> > > energy solutions*, we need to dig deep and make the
> > > necessary cultural changes to enable a lot less
> > > consumption, a lot more efficiency, and a built in
> > > insistence on circular economies.
> > > Again, most environmental groups advocate for collective
> > > action and reject the notion that personal change is
> > > sufficient.
> > > - Still, *wind and solar are much cleaner solutions than
> > > fossil fuels*, especially if we are smart about it. Many of
> > > the claims made by POTH about the efficiency of wind and
> > > solar are demonstrably false. This review
> > > <https://350bayarea.nationbuilder.com/r?u=39OpnUvHa8tDprvTpHsJOyYLzlZhPg4uCfbWvCIx5Gs0dsDiBIG6ggS3kZUMB80Suxu71_TiqTYF-6pBO3lz5VrW7mR_tZ4CqGLZttvvkDigLHyNaxD3_cZR53DrTxSTnvW6uzuvJEuUb3-ePKdWiA&e=ea10f30fb62dc059fa1dd71d0efa3ae4&utm_source=350bayarea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=covid_5&n=2>
> > > does a great job debunking many of the specific POTH
> > > claims.
> > > - *When Breitbart embraces a documentary, it is a powerful
> > > signal*. The fossil fuel industry has been waging an
> > > effective PR campaign for more than a century (listen to
> > > the Drilled podcast
> > > <https://350bayarea.nationbuilder.com/r?u=zA8hGV0kKf17gWwJT2gjeQA9phHw4ofcMHXeaxF3gzjjxtY8rwTmzBisTOsTITOc&e=ea10f30fb62dc059fa1dd71d0efa3ae4&utm_source=350bayarea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=covid_5&n=3
> > > it’s not surprising that the cultural elements
> > > instilled by that campaign have infiltrated this particular
> > > treatment.
> > > - *Talking about overpopulation lightly is irresponsible
> > > and frankly* creepy. Reproductive rights and improved
> > > education options for girls and women is an important human
> > > right. But a bunch of old white men in this film lecturing
> > > the world about overpopulation is just wrong.
> > > 350.org is not funded
> > > <https://350bayarea.nationbuilder.com/r?u=p8qboc8p4UY3jne2Mnnnp_qvYrW5hhrZG42N-AqCULBuSu_K8e64IXogf0RxahsfKCbsKM9AQIGlF4p7mcB9JQ&e=ea10f30fb62dc059fa1dd71d0efa3ae4&utm_source=350bayarea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=covid_5&n=4>
> > > by corporations. It’s also worth noting that 350
> > > Bay Area is not the same entity as 350.org; we are
> > > completely separate, set our own agenda, raise our own
> > > operating funds, and have our own governance structures. We
> > > work closely with 350.org, support their initiatives, and
> > > have a great deal of respect for the global organization
> > > and the individuals working for and with them. In order for
> > > a local group to use 350 in its name, it does agree to work
> > > on climate issues and to be good allies in the work.
> > >
> > > The Heated newsletter by Emily Atkin is worth signing up for
> > > in general, and her response to the documentary
> > > <https://350bayarea.nationbuilder.com/r?u=4b4HJRwQb5APRofusJBZFyWTlELW9KqqIPUsrsRhf7smjxtFvAr1hQreY9Yy2bxH&e=ea10f30fb62dc059fa1dd71d0efa3ae4&utm_source=350bayarea&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=covid_5&n=5>
> > > is definitely worth a read. We are perplexed that Michael Moore
> > > is associated with this documentary, and strongly suggest more
> > > than a spoon full of skepticism be applied.
> > >
> > > Laura Neish, Executive Director and the team