Smash the patriarchy! Let's have a shevolution! > From: "Heather L. Howard" <http://www.stanford.edu/~hlhoward> > Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 19:40:04 +0000 > > Not a � shecession � �no! > > ________________________________ > From: The New York Times <http://www.nytimes.com/~nytdirect> > Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2020 11:00:02 AM > > More women than men lost jobs. > > May 9, 2020 > > People wait in line for help with unemployment benefits at the One-Stop Career > Center in Las Vegas in March.John Locher/Associated Press > > By Alisha Haridasani Gupta > > Gender Reporter > > �We should go ahead and call this a �shecession.�� > > � C. Nicole Mason, president and chief executive of the Institute for Women�s > Policy Research > > The unemployment numbers released on Friday confirmed what we had all > anticipated: The economic crisis brought on by the coronavirus pandemic is > staggering, or as one research analyst at Bank of America put it to The Times, � > literally off the charts.� > > The scale of the crisis is unlike anything since the Great Depression. And for > the first time in decades, this crisis has a predominantly nonwhite, female > face. > > �I think we should go ahead and call this a �shecession�,� said C. Nicole Mason, > president and chief executive of the Institute for Women�s Policy Research, in > a nod to the 2008 recession that came to be known as the �mancession� > because > more men were affected. > > Women accounted for 55 percent of the 20.5 million jobs lost in April, > according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics > raising the unemployment rate for adult women to about 15 percent from 3.1 > percent in February. By comparison, the unemployment rate for adult men was 13 > percent. > > Women of color fared worse, with unemployment rates for black women at 16.4 > percent and Hispanic women at 20.2 percent. > > According to an analysis by the National Women�s Law Center > this is > the first time since 1948 that the female unemployment rate has reached double > digits. > > The April jobs represent an abrupt, disappointing reversal from a major > milestone in December, when women held more payroll jobs than men > for the > first time in about a decade. > > The biggest reason for these losses is that the industries hardest hit by the > pandemic � leisure, hospitality, education and even some parts of health care � > are �disproportionately nonwhite and female,� said Diane Lim, senior adviser > for the Penn Wharton Budget Model, a nonpartisan research initiative. > > For years, those industries had been the fastest growing parts of the American > economy, Lim noted, driving the strong job numbers and growth. At the same time, > male-dominated industries, like manufacturing, were shrinking. > > Kimberly Ireland, left, helps her daughter Kyla Ireland, with Kyla�s > three-week-old baby in Las Vegas. Kimberly Ireland was laid off from her job as > a bell desk dispatcher at the Mirage casino-resort, where she worked for a > decade.John Locher/Associated Press > > As a result, women were doing better in the labor market before the pandemic. > > Women �were making some real gains,� Jasmine Tucker, a researcher at the law > center, said. �Now there�s this huge step back.� According to the N.W.L.C. > analysis, this crisis has in one month wiped out all of the job gains that > women had made in the past decade. > > But female-dominated jobs, like hospitality or child care, tend to also be > underpaid and undervalued, which means that many of the newly unemployed women > now have less of a financial cushion to fall back on, said Mason, of the > Institute for Women�s Policy Research. The problem is compounded for single > mothers > a third of single mothers > were already living below the poverty line > and, since February, a > million of them have lost their jobs. > > Experts say it�s unlikely that those jobs will snap right back when states > reopen, because much of the recovery will depend on consumers who are already > skittish and financially struggling. With no vaccine or cure yet, �we just don� > t know how people are going to feel about going back to their favorite > restaurants,� Lim, the senior adviser, said. �How many people are going to take > cruises from now on? How many people are going to jump on flights and take > vacations?� > > All of the uncertainty only reinforces the need for more support and > protections for women and families, Mason said, adding that she is somewhat > encouraged by the action in Congress so far. > > �Just a couple months ago, the things that we all said were impossible, we�re > now doing, like basic income and paid sick leave,� she explained. > > Readers: Have you lost a job in the past few weeks? What was your job, and how > are you coping? Email us at http://www.nytimes.com/~inherwords<mailto: > http://www.nytimes.com/~inherwords>. > > What else is happening > > This weekend we�re celebrating Mother�s Day in the U.S. To mark the occasion, > our colleagues at NYT Parenting took a look at the whole messy, glorious, > complicated story of identity and motherhood > Here are a few of the stories. > Enjoy. > > [ > �We can do this on our own. You can�t wait for a man to come in and make your > dreams come true,� said Sarah McKnight, a pilot, who decided to have a child on > her own.Jackie Molloy for The New York Times > > * �We can do this on our own.� A photojournalist captured the lives of four > women who chose to become mothers on their own. [Read the story > * �How motherhood changed my �� Sixteen women on how having children > altered their resolve, fears, body image, ambition and more. [Read the story< > * �I�ve never seen anything like these changes.� The science behind �mommy > brain� shows that pregnancy and parenthood kick neurological development into > high gear. [Read the story]< > > In Her Words is written by Alisha Haridasani Gupta and edited by Francesca > Donner. Our art director is Catherine Gilmore-Barnes, and our photo editor is > Sandra Stevenson.