[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scandalous leak!
- To: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>, heather Howard <http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40>
- Subject: Re: Scandalous leak!
- From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 18:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 in-012.lax.mailroute.net 49V24l67RHz2Dc6r
- User-agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
On Sat, 23 May 2020, Robert wrote:
> > From: heather Howard <http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40>
> > Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 13:58:36 -0700
> >
> > So I got the original e-mail leaked to an undergrad and then published in
>
> > Stanford Daily and Stanford Report. The professor followed up with a message
> > to ask us to not share internal correspondences but it was too late. Here’s
> > the Stanford Daily article:
> >
> > https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/05/22/plans-for-2020-21-academic-year-still-undetermined-despite-widely-circulated-email/
>
> The quote from Isabel Meusen about German 3 is pretty funny.
yes. when leadership does not issue clear communication people
pounce on anything(at least at UMass Med Ctr I was impressed with
their communications)