[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: screening vs. diagnostic mamm
- To: noelle
- Subject: Re: screening vs. diagnostic mamm
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:10:00 -0700
- Keywords: our-Oakland-cell-phone-number
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 10:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
>
> ultrasound is safer than mammogram but insurance doesn't cover it
Well, just because a test is safe to take doesn't necessarily mean that
there aren't overtesting downsides.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/04/13/398818949/the-hidden-cost-of-mammograms-more-testing-and-overtreatment
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2020, robert wrote:
> > > From: Noelle <noelle>
> > > Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 09:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > > not really.
> >
> > You mean, despite all the hand-wringing about overtesting, this is the one
> > test that has no downsides?
> >
> > I wonder how one can know whether taking any given test will have
> > downsides or not? Does it always require research? 🤷