> From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg> > Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 10:38:41 -0800 (PST) > > yeah we went all out then, with field hospitals and such and the > overload of patients didn't happen then(while NY,NJ and MA did have > that). Maybe they counted on this to erradicate it immediately. They > didn't count on how bad a state by state piecemeal approach was a > disaster. I'm not fully convinced that a federal, nationwide approach would've been better. People cannot just be kept in their homes for months on end without finding ways to rationalize meeting people outside their household, no matter the risk or area of coverage. > On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, robert wrote: > > It might have been better if there had not been a lockdown in Ca > > in March so that the worse could've come earlier and people would've been > > more freaked out and stay more vigilant now. Cans seem to be > > letting up their guard since they never got to see the bodies pile up. > > > > Oh, well. Next time we'll get it right.