Ah. So, the anti-hero concept started early, but begs the question of why the anti-hero is so identifying and compelling by audiences. Maybe we all long for an alpha-male, despite all the pitfalls of patriarchy. > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 15:14:33 -0700 (PDT) > > work addressn novel discussion on electoral-vote.com. I wish this > interpretation was more widely known. > > "M.B. in Pittsburgh, PA, writes: Ultimately, The Great Gatsby > presents America's most uncomfortable and unassailable truths: that > God is money, that we are all adherents to the religion of > capitalism via the American Dream, and that it's simultaneously > beautiful and pathetic... > A classroom aide in my 9th grade class once asked to borrow a copy > and was disappointed after reading it because she didn't understand > why Gatsby was so enamored with Daisy, considering how terrible a > person she is. But you don't even have to open the book to see that > it isn't a love story, even though many teach it as one....the book > is clearly an indictment of this social class, which in every way > has defined America, from slaveholders to the Roosevelts, Kennedys > and Bushes. > > And yet Fitzgerald manages to get the reader to admire Gatsby, much > like we strangely admire Tony Soprano and Walter White. Gatz > transformed into Gatsby just like Drumpf transformed into Trump. > > The novel lacks diversity and is told from the perspective of > privilege. But I devote almost a month to the book and spend a fair > bit of time outside of the text, discussing concepts like distorting > the American Dream, wealth inequality, old money's condescension to > new money, the "lost generation," and sexist character archetypes. > It engages students in a way that other work addressn novels fail > to do anymore. ...Money trumps religion in this country, even if it > takes money using a bowling pin to bludgeon its enemy to death. We > get the leaders we deserve, and Gatsby gets to the roots of it.