[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: maybe you should reconsider Ghostbusters
- To: noelle
- Subject: Re: maybe you should reconsider Ghostbusters
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2023 16:09:43 -0700
- Keywords: our-Oakland-cell-phone-number
https://qz.com/176613/ghostbusters-harold-ramis-greatest-movie-ever-about-republican-economic-policy
goes into painful detail about how Reaganomics played into the script.
Pretty interesting.
I don't think I could agree with Reagan having a sense of humor. Most of
his humor was written for him and he just regurgitated it. After leaving
the governorship of Ca, he became a mindless puppet. Just ask
Linda Wertheimer.
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 12:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
>
> J.T. in Greensboro, NC, writes: On the subject of conservative
> comedy: As a historian of late 20th century film and media I would
> argue that a lot of the most beloved comedies of the 1980s (think
> John Hughes and Harold Ramis) are at their core fundamentally
> conservative. Scholars and critics have published a fair bit on the
> Reaganism at the core of films like Ghostbusters and The Breakfast
> Club.
>
> While I'm firmly left of center and love Rodney Dangerfield, it's
> hard to view the popularity of his schtick as the put-upon husband
> who can't get any respect as anything but a reaction to modest
> social gains made by women and others during the 1970s. Dangerfield
> was a nobody and was mostly out of comedy for a couple of decades
> until the social situation changed to make his schtick effective and
> to make him one of the most popular people in America. A film like
> Back to School (1986), which I personally find hilarious despite my
> political misgivings, is completely within the paradigm of
> Reaganism. At the risk of starting to paste in lines from my
> dissertation, I'll stop there and let readers go back and revisit
> the films themselves! Rightly or wrongly, Reagan-era comedy
> configured bureaucrats, cultural elitists, and old-money types as
> villains to punch-up at and did so effectively.
>
> Conservativism isn't fundamentally unfunny, the problem is that
> conservatism lacks talented comedy stylists for, say, the last 30
> some-odd years. Shooting from the hip, I'd actually say that the
> decline in conservative comedy may be coincident with its embrace of
> the culture wars that began with Reaganism but really hit its
> full-flowering with the Gingrich years. Reagan at least had a sense
> of humor, even if you didn't agree with him.