[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: landlines
- To: Noelle <noelle>
- Subject: Re: landlines
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:35:15 -0800
- Keywords: our-Oakland-cell-phone-number
> From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 08:56:52 -0800
>
> > From: Noelle <noelle>
> > Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 07:28:44 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/11/07/opinion-ca-regulators-should-embrace-a-wireless-future/
>
> This article is not biased at all. NOT.
>
> The problem is that there is no national guarantee of service for cellular
> like there is with plain old telephone service. Only after those
> guarantees are added to national legislation would it be worth the CPUC
> changing direction.
Actually, I think Universal Service is in a bit of a mess due to
neoliberal policies which have passed through the FCC since 1921.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund
So, maybe it wouldn't matter at this point whether the CPUC changes or
not.