[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 💀 The first 50 kills are free (fwd )



I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Gavin Newsom is so conservative that he supports the billionaire class and protects tech companies. I never liked him ('tho, I did think he was funny during COVID), and, of course, never voted for him. I'm sure Becerra will be more of the same. > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 10:13:38 -0700 (PDT) > > > Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:46:27 +0000 > > From: Lever Daily <http://www.levernews.com/~editor> > > > > By Veronica Riccobene and Lyna Bentahar > > > > 👇 Further down in this newsletter: > > > > * The artificial intelligence industry is legislating room for error — > > including death.  > > * Progressives are testing newfound momentum by proposing more limits on > > Wall Street. > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > RONNIE'S REPORT > > > > 😵 Some room for error > > > > The artificial intelligence firm Anthropic has pitched itself as a > > pro-regulation, “safety-first [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/e0072178?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07]�;> > �� alternative to its competitors — but sample rules quietly circulating > > on Capitol Hill reveal the staggering scale of what the firm is willing to > > sacrifice for AI dominance. The draft legislation, proposed by Anthropic and > > obtained by Politico [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/1b482fc9?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07], > > would let the federal government interfere with an AI model’s release > > only if it risks immediate, predictable damages of more than $1 billion or > > 50 human deaths… potentially giving AI firms dozens of free kills. > > > > Anthropic’s draft bill also requires AI developers to submit a variety of > > security and safety data to the federal government, while simultaneously > > creating an exemption blocking these records from Freedom of Information Act > > requests. > > > > These terms closely mirror those in an Anthropic-endorsed [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/993eacf1?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > Ca state law [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/d5a62210?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) — roughly a year after he vetoed a much > > stronger AI safety bill [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/3ac8f77b?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > . The draft legislation is also similar to a public policy brief [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/0cf2c747?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > published by Anthropic this June. > > > > “How can you watch Hugging Face, Coxon, & rogue AI swarms [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/00542e37?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > and conclude that the bill you cooked up in June is sufficient?” asked [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/b21da72d?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > Alex Bores, a data scientist and New York state lawmaker. “This comes > > nowhere close to the speed of developments nor the speed we need to keep > > people safe.” > > > > Can Democrats Unite on AI Regulation? > > Alex Bores has a plan to make AI safeguards a central issue in the 2028 > > Democratic presidential primaries.… > > > > This year, Anthropic pledged $40 million [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/c2937515?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > in political spending to back candidates in support of responsible AI > > through its preferred PAC, Public First Action. Ahead of the 2028 elections, > > the company is also forming a “presidential engagement [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/29082f63?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07]�;> > �� program to engage potential nominees from both parties on AI.  > > > > Meanwhile, Anthropic’s signature AI model Claude will soon be available > > for use [ > > https://www.levernews.com/r/0b4ce97e?m=c7c41f62-6bc5-4c98-ae9b-16d6eceafe07] > > by Senate staffers. “Legislop is gonna be amazing,” joked The Lever’s > > Freddy Brewster.


Why do you want this page removed?