[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spam Bouncer
- To: Wilbern Cobb <http://www.csoft.org/~vedge>
- Subject: Re: Spam Bouncer
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 08:51:32 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <20021202095940.http://www.csoft.net/~A6690>
- Keywords: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert
> From: Wilbern Cobb <http://www.csoft.org/~vedge>
> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:59:40 -0500
>
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:53:16AM -0500, Robert wrote:
> > To: Wilbern Cobb <http://www.csoft.org/~vedge>
> >
> > > From: Wilbern Cobb <http://www.csoft.org/~vedge>
> > > Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 02:04:55 -0500
> > >
> > > Could you use SpamAssassin instead of Spam Bouncer on leary? There are
> > > example procmail recipes at http://docs.csoft.net/micro/pmail.html.
> > >
> > > Spam Bouncer does a bunch of counter-productive checks.
> >
> > OK, I did this.
>
> Thanks.
FYI: I've been running Spam Bouncer on my home computer after downloading
my SpamAssassin'd mail and I found that Spam Bouncer correctly finds more
spam than SpamAssassin.
I'll probably keep this set-up.