[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: This sounds familiar



 > From: ", Flora" <http://www.state.vt.us/~Flora.>
 > Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 09:26:50 +0000
 >
 > There is one phone password with my bank. Is your second verification another 
 > password?

Sorta.  It's an answer to security questions that I elected.  According to
my password manager, it looks like I have answers for my high school
graduation year, mom's birthday, youngest's sibling's middle name, etc.
They randomly ask one of the questions.

 > Three pieces of information must be verified when I call my bank before they 
 > will continue. One is the phone password. When I gave a false password, they 
 > sought another way to verify my identification.

I imagine that's probably similar to my bank.  I think my bank asks my
name and the last four digits of my SSN and mother's maiden name and then
the security question.

 > When I set up my phone password, I told my bank not to continue with the call 
 > if I didn't know my phone password. I guess that didn't work. 

Oh.  But, they ask you for the other two pieces of information, right?

 > They should use the number on the secure token. Maybe that's it. When the 
 > caller (should be me) asks for a hint on the password, the representative can 
 > ask, "what is the number on your secure token?" This may throw off a would be 
 > thief. 

Yeah, if they know that you have a secure token.  I mean, they should
assume that if all identity methods fail, that you would just drive to the
bank and show them your mug.

 > I'm just thinking of ways that could prevent someone from calling pretending to 
 > be me and getting through. The person on the other end is human after all and 
 > not a computer. This has to be thought of. 

Absolutely true.

 > I just want these financial institutions to have more security measures in 
 > place to prevent a criminal from getting through on the phone. 

Agreed.  But, they did refund your money, so, in some sense, it's their
dime if their security measures are inadequate.

 > On May 16, 2015, at 11:10 PM, "robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote:
 > >> From: Flora  <http://www.gmail.com/~flora>
 > >> Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 23:02:12 -0400
 > >> 
 > >> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/tech/science-of-identity-theft/
 > >> 
 > >> I'm wondering if this is what happened, at least in part.
 > >> 
 > >> Two step verification may be helpful online, but what about when calling?  I 
 > >> do 
 > >> have a stronger phone password, but tried tricking the person on the other 
 > >> end 
 > >> recently. I didn't give my correct phone password to see what they would do. 
 > >> 
 > >> They asked for my card number including the ccv. Maybe I should periodically 
 > >> 
 > >> report my cards as lost, so I get new numbers. This still doesn't seem like 
 > >> the 
 > >> answer. When I initially set up the phone password, I told them to never let 
 > >> me 
 > >> through unless I gave the correct password. I guess that didn't work. 
 > > 
 > > You need to have a second shared secret.  This is what my bank does.  I
 > > guess your bank doesn't do this.  Too bad.




Why do you want this page removed?