On Sun, 24 May 2020, robert wrote: > BTW, w.r.t. my previous comment: caution isn't sufficient. We'd also need > support with policies. For example, why should just a certain set of > people (essential workers) carry all the burden of potentially acquiring > disease (not just COVID-19) without also getting better benefits, > including vacation, sick time, and health care coverage? To me, we can > throw caution to the wind if we don't first fix this. it's ridiculous in a supposedly rich country we can't pay workers $2000/month if they lost their jobs, even the contractors such as hair dressers!!