It seems like those countries that require a 2-week quarantine upon arrival will probably be the least likely to pass along the virus. Then again, you'll use up a lot of your vacation cooped up in a hotel for 2 weeks, probably just watching TV or reading. Why bother? > From: heather Howard <http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40> > Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 11:02:42 -0700 > > I was thinking of other risks, difficulties and ethics > > -: you are possibly taking the virus with you to the country you plan to visit > (selfish) > - No matter how many negative tests you have, you could be exposed at any point > after the test, and the tests often show false positives/neegatives > - you get sick through exposure at your destination in a hotel restaurant, bar > or elsewhere > - you bring it back with you > - these are places starved for tourist dollars, but is it fair to send them > Texans, Floridians or even Cans trying to flee their own virus-ridden > communities? > > What are the social responsibilities of travel during Covid? > > > On Jul 12, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote: > > > > According to > > https://www.tmc.edu/news/2020/07/coronavirus-connection-a-texas-medical-center-continuing-update/ , > > flying on a plane is risk level 7. More risky than working in an office > > building, but less than going to a movie theater. > > > >> From: heather Howard <http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40> > >> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 10:43:55 -0700 > >> > >> I know the tourism industry is suffering, but why would any country want > >> Americans onsite? Why would anyone want to take the risk to travel? So > >> confused.