Hmm. Didn't know it all boiled down to data. > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:12:28 -0700 (PDT) > > https://www.mercurynews.com/2024/03/11/lily-gladstones-upset-loss-to-emma-stone-was-expected-for-this-reason/ > > Gladstone, who has a White mother and whose father is of Blackfeet > and Nimíipuu heritage, is on screen for about 56 minutes in a film > that’s three hours and 26 minutes long... > With that 27% screen time, some critics have argued that the film is > more interested in the character played by Leonardo DiCaprio, who is > on screen for 1 hour and 49 minutes. Gladstone’s limited screen time > also sparked debate months ago over whether her role was supporting > and she should have campaigned in the supporting actress category. > > “I am on record as saying that Emma Stone is going to win,” Belloni > said. “It’s a flashier performance.” In Yorgos Lanthimos’ costume > drama, Stone plays a woman who goes on a journey of self-discovery > after being brought back to life by an eccentric surgeon. She’s on > screen for one hour and 37 minutes, or 69% of “Poor Things” running > time. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------