[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: best actress
- To: Noelle <noelle>
- Subject: Re: best actress
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:23:03 -0700
- Keywords: our-Oakland-cell-phone-number
Hmm. Didn't know it all boiled down to data.
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
>
> https://www.mercurynews.com/2024/03/11/lily-gladstones-upset-loss-to-emma-stone-was-expected-for-this-reason/
>
> Gladstone, who has a White mother and whose father is of Blackfeet
> and Nimíipuu heritage, is on screen for about 56 minutes in a film
> that’s three hours and 26 minutes long...
> With that 27% screen time, some critics have argued that the film is
> more interested in the character played by Leonardo DiCaprio, who is
> on screen for 1 hour and 49 minutes. Gladstone’s limited screen time
> also sparked debate months ago over whether her role was supporting
> and she should have campaigned in the supporting actress category.
>
> “I am on record as saying that Emma Stone is going to win,” Belloni
> said. “It’s a flashier performance.” In Yorgos Lanthimos’ costume
> drama, Stone plays a woman who goes on a journey of self-discovery
> after being brought back to life by an eccentric surgeon. She’s on
> screen for one hour and 37 minutes, or 69% of “Poor Things” running
> time.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------